Let them have iPad. (image: smh.com.au)
When times are hard it is high time to start making wise choices. Don’t cut things that will make costs higher, and invest in those that will save you money. Unfortunately not that many people make wise choices.
Leicester council has attempted to make such sage-like choices; looking to save almost £50,000 through the implementation of iPads across the council. The union comments that it was a disgrace (see article), however the savings from the removal of print costs could be preventing slightly more extensive job cuts.
The argument has inevitably, or should I say tragically, boiled down to a matter of ideologies. The union commenting on the “insult to our members, a real insult” and councillors were too busy talking about how Grandma would be slightly less intimidated, or the iPad being less bulky to carry. Rather than emphasising how the iPad makes councillors lives more comfortable, the emphasis of the council should of been all on cost. A cost-focused PR approach would of extinguished the other side of the argument - rather than fanning its flames further.
Such ostrich tendencies are not uncommon. In media the bedraggled print sector seems intent on non-adoption of cost saving print technologies which reduce the amount of ink used by up to 50 per cent.
Anecdotally the effort an Uncle of mine has to go through to pitch on cost-saving print technology to newspaper printers is just as unreasonable. This is despite the technology reducing ink costs by near 50 per cent.
My comment is let the have the iPad, it is about time that a public institution was able to use the latest software and reap the cost benifits. Too often the reson for poor perfomance is that they are lumbered with out of date and inefficent tecnologies from two decades prior.
If it is implemented unions can always resort to this.
Let them have iPad.

(image: smh.com.au)
When times are hard it is high time to start making wise choices. Don’t cut things that will make costs higher, and invest in those that will save you money. Unfortunately not that many people make wise choices.
Leicester council has attempted to make such sage-like choices; looking to save almost £50,000 through the implementation of iPads across the council. The union comments that it was a disgrace (see article), however the savings from the removal of print costs could be preventing slightly more extensive job cuts.
The argument has inevitably, or should I say tragically, boiled down to a matter of ideologies. The union commenting on the “insult to our members, a real insult” and councillors were too busy talking about how Grandma would be slightly less intimidated, or the iPad being less bulky to carry. Rather than emphasising how the iPad makes councillors lives more comfortable, the emphasis of the council should of been all on cost. A cost-focused PR approach would of extinguished the other side of the argument - rather than fanning its flames further.
Such ostrich tendencies are not uncommon. In media the bedraggled print sector seems intent on non-adoption of cost saving print technologies which reduce the amount of ink used by up to 50 per cent.
Anecdotally the effort an Uncle of mine has to go through to pitch on cost-saving print technology to newspaper printers is just as unreasonable. This is despite the technology reducing ink costs by near 50 per cent.
My comment is let the have the iPad, it is about time that a public institution was able to use the latest software and reap the cost benifits. Too often the reson for poor perfomance is that they are lumbered with out of date and inefficent tecnologies from two decades prior.
If it is implemented unions can always resort to this.